The Free Market Salvation Starts With a True Dow 30 Relative to Investor Transparency

There can be no Financial Reform until the Base & its 30 Dow Components that moves the World Financial Market daily, are Paid Hour Accountable to an Hourly Benchmark for all its Investors with their respective OiBiTDA Performance.

Patent Pending for the Salvation of the Free Market System (see abstract Investor Transparency Tab )

A Real Time Case for a Free Market as Demonstrated by the Character of a

Corporation’s OiBiTDA as Opposed to the Volume of the Shares that are Traded

Certainly you must know that with political involvement nothing of substance is going to get done with more regulations; when less is better. And if something by chance does get accomplished it will be a stop gap until the next crises arises from faulty Equity evaluation methods.

I am going to make a situational statement that is the root of the problem facing the Financial Issues currently taking place for which my Technology has the solution as previewed below.

Because no two Public Corporations have the same number of shares outstanding the Financial World is not able to: A) Join the Trading Value of two or more Public Corporations within a Portfolio and Mutual Fund (Including Hedge Funds) B) Combine two Corporations in a merger or acquisition

for the purpose in both cases to determine compatibility (Cash Profit per Paid Hour) and future accountability (Cash Profit ROI) with acceptable Financial Criteria—The Return on Investment for Trading Value.

As a result, everyday market traders are dictating by their trading volumes the Value of Public Equities when the path to Real Value is Cash Flow as received from customers and deposited in a Bank.

The Technology behind the OIBiTDA Solution is the Performance of Public Corporations based on the Efficiency of its work force relative to the very latest quarter’s Cash Profit. It is the guiding light to Share Holder Value. The light is not how much the DJIA total goes up or down and how many pennies any individual stock varies when daily traders have a good or bad feeling based on (??????).

The DJIA from over 100 years ago was designed as an up and down gauge (1100 today 1,000 yesterday = +10%) to guide Investors about a group of well managed Public Corporations from which followers could judge whether Investor Companies (not the stocks) were operating adequately. Now the cart is before the horse. The Dow 30 and a good percentage of the most active stocks almost move up and down in sync (one’s purchase is another Investor’s sale) because the every day traders must know how much these Corporations are worth per Share—with tongue in cheek.

As an example of how far this can be taken on any day; Google has one of the highest, if not the highest rate of Cash Profit per Sales 38% (Quarter 2) that can’t possible be improved because of added competition or maintained when joined with any other Corporation.

OiBiTDA is synonymous with Cash Profit as updated once a Quarter per Market Browser via Yahoo as posted to my Floating Data Base of 30 stocks with their various OiBiTDA ROIs. Investment Bankers practice the Cash Flow path to Business Value via ROIs for singular Public Corporations. For some reason they did not practice what they preach. Proceeds from all as divided by the Cost of all equals ROI. The situation was aggravated when Mortgage Banks did not have the means or did not want to reveal when such an ROI was waning. And Accountants didn’t help; Cash as deposited in a Bank is their most verifiable fact. Shame on them too and not a word from the Profession; let the Bankers take the blame, OiBiTDA is waiting in the wings to be the common numerator for all Public Corporations traceable to SEC reporting and tractable to weekly Sales and Hours Paid.

Those Hours Paid will also reveal efficiency. A Corporation paid a certain amount of Hours the previous Quarter (salary at 40 per week) and pays another amount in the current quarter; more is inefficient, less is efficient. Using Hours Paid to recognize both the Inhernet Value of OiBiTDA and Trading Value for an Individual stock, one has an Hourly Rate for which an ROI can be calculated.

If an Investor wants to invest in a Fund, he or she will get an Hourly Credit from a Mutual Fund $2,000/$51.44 per Paid Hour = 38.9 Paid Hours. The Hourly Rate will only vary when the OiBiTDA of one of the 51 Stocks that make up the Data Base changes or when shares are bought or sold.

During the week of 9/29 Oracle changed it OiBiTDA Performance during Q 3 ended 8/31). The results decreased OiBiTDA $1.4 billion X 4 = $5.6 as a year, to account for a $7.95 drop per Paid Hour

Share Value and Paid Hour Accountability of the Dow 30 is done within a half hour of closing and analyzed in the charts of an Excel File. Every Mutual Fund could use the same Excel File for their exact number of shares that is owned by the fund compared to the ROI of all Outstanding Shares of all its holdings. If the percent is not exceeded, it is because some stocks are performing below the mean ROI of all the holdings

Regarding a Mutual Fund that I have since sold. Gabelli Equity Trust is a good Close End Performer that has approximately 475 different Equities with 30% perhaps foreign. How can all of them be managed by buy, hold and sell decisions when they don’t have a common numerator as to how each affects the common denominator of the composite’s Hedge-Index. In addition, not to sell foreign holdings makes sense in a down Market when Trading Value may be suspect from changes due to exchange rates or non-active trading.

Gabelli specifically states that all semi-annual statements are audited by Executives of the Firm. Again this may be where the next confidence crises are lurking.

Regarding Google the darling of this generation that gets away without paying any dividends: Cisco was that of the last generation. CEO accountability is a key word for all concerned. It could not be more focused when OiBiTDA by the Hour is broken down by Segment and then by key Cost Centers like Research and the Corporate Office as a whole and in particular Executive Salaries and/or a CEO's compensation package. None have Sales and thus would be negative; but they all have Hours Paid and thus would produce an Hourly Rate that in turn would be divided by the Trading Value as a Rate per Paid Hour. Meaning the world would have negative accountability as a drain on Trading Value. The same Segment and Cost Data numerically accurate would further enhance Sarbanes Oxley compliance with arithmetic data.

What really would inspire Congress and the Budget Office to bless the OiBiTDA solution?— Government Agencies and/or departments whether they have Sales or are a Cost Center. City, State and U.S. operations all have employees — thus, all Dollars will have a very accountable Paid Hourly Rate.